Walnut

Subscribe to RSS Feed for recent updates
Subscribe to RSS Feed for recent updates

YANA - YOU ARE NOT ALONE NOW

PROSTATE CANCER SUPPORT SITE

 

SURVIVOR STORIES  :  DISCUSSION FORUM  :  WIVES & PARTNERS  :  TELL YOUR STORY  :  UPDATE YOUR STORY  :  DONATIONS  :  TROOP-C

YANA HOME PAGE  :  DON'T PANIC  :  GOOD NEWS!  :  DIAGNOSIS  :  SURVIVING  :  TREATMENT CHOICES  :  RESOURCES  :  ABOUT US  :  MAIL US

 

    GOLD    
This is his Country or State Flag

Ropp Joachim lives in Ontario, Canada. He was 74 when he was diagnosed in January, 2010. His initial PSA was 6.01 ng/ml, his Gleason Score was 8, and he was staged T2. His initial treatment choice was Surgery (Retropubic Prostatectomy) and his current treatment choice is None. Here is his story.

My urologist advised hormone therapy and radiation, because I was "too old". After having undergone the usual x-rays and scans I had an appointment on April 29 2010 with Dr. Lukka, Professor, Department of Oncology McMaster University, Hamilton. He informed me that I was a high risk patient (Gleason score 7, but three cores showed 8) and that hormone therapy and radiation would be the recommended therapy for me (total radiation seven and a half weeks of treatment Monday to Friday). I did not want to commit myself to this treatment before I would be able to get a second opinion.

On June 10, 2010 I had an appointment with Dr. Whelan, who performs prostate surgery at another hospital in Hamilton (part of McMaster U. Institute of Urology). He said that as I was a very young 74 I was "facing risk of disease progression in the future and that it probably would be best for me to start with radical retropubic prostatectomy" I could require radiation either after the surgery or in the future.

Now I had two opinions in favour of surgery (my family doctor and Dr. Whelan) and two in favour of hormone and radiation therapy. I decided to go for the operation for the following reasons:

For younger patients operation seemed to be the preferred procedure. The risk/reward factors in my opinion were better than the alternative.

Risks: incontinence, erection dysfunction as opposed to hot flashes, mood swings, osteoporosis, destruction of good cells, bowel and urinary problems. I was in good shape and I liked the idea of cutting out the cancer at source.

Surgery: July 5th, 2010.

The surgical pathology report was good. No evidence of cancer in the lymph nodes and no radiation required. I have had two PSA tests in the meantime, and they were both excellent. - I was in the hospital for three days and the catheter was removed after about two weeks. Now, after about six months I am about 90% continent.

UPDATED

April 2012

April 8, 2012 - Everything is fine. PSA: 0. However, incontinence is still a slight problem. I still have to have a little pad in my underpants, because a little drop escapes at unforeseen moments. It's annoying, but I guess there are worse things!

UPDATED

June 2013

Everything is fine. I went to a physiotherapist to help to reactivate the muscles, but the sporadic little drips still persist. I think I have to live with it.

UPDATED

October 2014

After my prostate was taken out about 4 years ago, my PSA count was 0. Then it slowly crept up to where it is now (0.16). I was told 0.2 is the criterion when radiation treatment is usually recommended. I therefore signed up for radiation treatment in January 2015. It will take 7 weeks, 5 times a week.

Ropp's e-mail address is: ehueniken AT yahoo.com (replace "AT" with "@")

NOTE: Ropp has not updated his story for more than 15 months, so you may not receive any response from him.


RETURN TO INDEX : RETURN TO HOME PAGE LINKS